Program Evaluation October 9, 2020 – T. Leanne Campbell, Ph.D.Safe and Sound: EFT and the New Era of Couple Interventions Please complete this online survey below. Instruction1. The following program objectives were met:a. The participant will be able to identify the key components of an attachment orientation to bonding, couple distress and relationship repair.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeb. The participant will be able to describe the general map to intervention offered by Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreec. The participant will be able to generalize this map to working with individuals (EFIT) and families (EFFT).Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreed. The participant will be able to outline the macro intervention, the EFT Tango and describe how it plays out in session.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreee. The participant will be able to describe how EFT plays out with escalated and depressed withdrawn couples.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreef. The participant will be able to identify the path to core corrective emotional experiences that resolve distress and shape secure bonds.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree2. Accuracy and utility of content were discussed.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree4. Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree5. Teaching methods were effective.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree6. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeInstructor: T. Leanne Campbell, Ph.D.7. Knew the subject matter.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree8. Presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning; included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies).Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree9. Elaborated upon the stated objectives.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree10. Maintained my interest.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree11. Answered questions effectively.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree12. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree13. Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations).Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeVenue, Setting, etc.14. Zoom technology was adequate for my needs.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree15. Technical support was useful.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree16. Program brochure was informative and accurate.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeLearning17. Information could be applied to my practice or other work context.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree18. Information contributes to achieving personal or professional goals.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree19. Issues of diversity were addressed.Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree20. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?Very LittleA LittleSomeA good dealA great deal21. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?Very LittleA LittleSomeA good dealA great deal22. This program enhanced my professional expertise.YesNo23. I would recommend this program to others.YesNo24. Teaching methods and tools focused on how to apply program content to my practice/work environment.Very LittleA LittleSomeA good dealA great deal25. Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats.Very LittleA LittleSomeA good dealA great deal26. The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information.Very LittleA LittleSomeA good dealA great dealParticipant Information27. Please note your profession and status. (Check all that apply) Psychologist Medical Professional Masters Level Licensed Therapist Social Worker Student Administrator University Faculty Other (enter description in field that appears below) 27. Other28. Please note years in your profession. Student 1-5 6-10 11-20 20+ 29. What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?30. What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?31. What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?Your Name (optional):
